Advertisement - Click for coupon or website
Login	Textbooks	Professor Ratings	Classified Ads	Apartment Guide
Recent Ratings
1. Rating on Ruth Oropeza in the History department
Teaching Ability Availability Helpfulness Workload* Opinion: HIS 1300 - I really dont understand the bad reviews on here. She's actually a great teacher who teaches about really interesting topics. The only thing she did that annoyed me a little bit was make it unclear what are readings were in class. Other than that she was great and all are exams and quizzes were online with a lockdown browser (no webcam). All in all if you want a pretty easy and interesting 1300 HIS class then I would recomend her. - Grade In Class:A Date Listed: 2026-04-29
2. Rating on Jane Baldwin in the Accounting department
Teaching Ability Availability Helpfulness Workload* Opinion: 3302 - The whining has to stop. Yes this class is hard, yes Baldwin does not allow phones or any technology, yes she is very strict. All of that said, she is by far the best professor for 3302. She knows the class is hard and prints you an entire note packet which, if you only study that material, you can make a 100 on every test. Not having technology, while sucks at times, keeps you engaged and her grade averages are consistently higher than other professors in this course. So complain all you want, she is an awesome helpful professor and one of the best in the business school. - Grade In Class:A Date Listed: 2026-04-29
3. Rating on Dworkin in the Geology department
Teaching Ability Availability Helpfulness Workload* Opinion: 1401 - Professor Dworkin was one of my favorite Geology professors, overall I really did enjoy his course, it first it sounds very boring and something many people seems not to have interest since most of the stuff are earthquakes, rocks, tsunamis, and lots of other stuff around our planet. But Professor Dworkin was extremely knowledgably of the entire course. It seems rough at first as I had him 3 times a week but he made each day very quick we were out within 45 minutes. He has 4 exams and are in person and 60 questions long but there are very easy as long as you did notes and study on his lectures. he also does quizzes once a week but to be honest, he did quizzes only like 5 times throughout the entire semester. One big thing i liked was NO HOMEWORK, only thing we had to do was read the wet dessert novel but i bought the audiobook to make it go quick ( there is an mini-exam dedicated to this book so it is required ). The lab that corresponds with the course is also extremely easy, I had a TA and she would check and make sure we did everything correctly before we turn in it, I got a A+ in lab, (25% of Lab goes towards your actual class grade ). Overall He is a very kind person who loves to engage with his students. P.S if you have him during the Spring Semester - he gives up extra break time when spring break comes around the corner! - Grade In Class:A Date Listed: 2026-04-29
4. Rating on Ericka Dunbar in the Religion department
Teaching Ability Availability Helpfulness Workload* Opinion: REL 1310 - I chose to take Dunbar even after reading poor reviews which I can now personally verify. On a personal level she is quite clearly emotional and disrespectful to those who disagree with her feminist or racial ideas. Those with traditional ideals were singled out and pushed back on - while minorities or females were allowed free reign to express their progressive interpretations of the Bible without critique. Everyone should be allowed to express their opinions regardless of being progressive, conservative, liberal, whatever it may be, but it's obvious if what you say does not align with Dunbar's agenda, its safe to say she will not let it slide and she WILL attempt to humiliate you or push back. On a teaching level it does not get better in the slightest. You are not allowed to use technology, she goes through slides faster than you can write, she will not post the slides, she gives "study guides" that are just graded pop-quizes that you are not allowed to take home to study. You're actually not allowed to take anything home or review past quizes. You are not allowed to ask questions about material on quizes or exams either. Her reasoning for this is she does not want to reveal the quetsions, but she brings it to the point where you dont even know what to study, probably because all she talks about in class is race and gender ideas in the Bible, this would normally be fine but it has nothing to do with the graded material. Theres much more to complain about but I think anyone who read this gets to point, don't take her if you have the choice. - Grade In Class:B Date Listed: 2026-04-29
5. Rating on Andrew Gutkowski in the History department
Teaching Ability Availability Helpfulness Workload* Opinion: HIS 1300 - Professor Gutkowski was a great teacher. He lectures every class with powerpoints. Every week there is a weekly reflection, and there are two essays of the semeseter and a midterm and a final (both take home and no lock down browser) Overall he is so nice and passionate about what he teaches! He is kind and understanding - Grade In Class:A Date Listed: 2026-04-29
6. Rating on Joshua King in the English department
Teaching Ability Availability Helpfulness Workload* Opinion: ENG 2301 - Dr. King is truly amazing. He is personable and intelligent. He teaches the material and makes it feel important. Try to read for the class but honestly if you just skim and BS it you should be fine. He is so kind, one of the best teachers I've had here at baylor especially as an english teacher - Grade In Class:A Date Listed: 2026-04-29
7. Rating on Thomas McGrath in the Chemistry department
Teaching Ability Availability Helpfulness Workload* Opinion: 1302 - McGrath is an incredible professor, he's very passionate about chemistry, and I can tell he's great at teaching. However, DO NOT TAKE HIS HONORS SECTION GEN CHEM 2 DO NOT TAKE HIS HONORS SECTION GEN CHEM 2 DO NOT TAKE HIS HONORS SECTION GEN CHEM TWO. Any other course of his? Sure, probably. Maybe not honors section gen chem 1. Whatever you do DO NOT TAKE HIS HONORS SECTION GEN CHEM TWO. I watch my chemistry expert friends leaving those exams with the lights in their eyes extinguished. It's like returning home from a war we just lost. I had no chemistry experience prior to college, so perhaps I was a lost cause from the start, but taking his honors section gen chem 2 is genuinely the worst mistake I've made at this university so far. The homework is doable (if youre okay with him slapping 50 questions due like on random tuesdays). It can be challenging but it really helps drive home the concepts. The homework was really manageable. The thing is!!!!! Answering every question on the homework flawlessly is still not enough for those exams. They're just impossible to understand. I understood the content just fine. I could do the homework. I got to that exam and just couldn't comprehend what the hell it was asking me. There were numbers I'd never seen and variables I'd never heard of. The exam questions are really just whispered to him in his sleep by satan himself, I'm sure. DO NOT TAKE HIS HONORS SECTION GEN CHEM 2. Take any of his other classes, he's a wonderful professor. Take any of his other classes. He's great at explaining things, and is a very helpful and wonderful professor. Honors gen chem 2 grading and exams is a fate I wouldn't wish on anyone. Consider taking McGrath, and DO NOT TAKE HIS HONORS SECTION GEN CHEM 2. - Grade In Class:B Date Listed: 2026-04-29
8. Rating on Soku Byoun in the Finance department
Teaching Ability Availability Helpfulness Workload* Opinion: 4360 - Whatever you do, NEVER TAKE HIM. Dr Byoun not only is horrible at teaching, he's acts all pissed off when you ask for clarification. When asking how to improve our grades in class, he said to "understand the concepts" but he NEVER teaches the concepts. Not only that, his formulas, calculations, and study guides are WRONG like 25% of the time, yet we are expected to get it right the first time with incorrect teaching. His expectations are absolutely obscene for someone who doesnt care if we learn the concepts. We go over once scenario for each topic and move on without time for questions or clarification. Half of what he says in class is not corroborated by either Pearson or his study material and if we use his logic on the written portion of the exam, sometimes he MARKS IT WRONG. This guy is a sorry excuse for a professor and can't even get the questions on his own lectures right. Im not sure why he has a job. The averages on his exams are in the 60s, yet is relieved that we did as "good" as we did with no curve. Never take his class, never even consider it. It will be the worst semester of your life. - Grade In Class:B Date Listed: 2026-04-29
9. Rating on John Cunningham in the Communication Studies department
Teaching Ability Availability Helpfulness Workload* Opinion: Interviewing - Not much to say other than he is good at his job and the class is easy. - Grade In Class:A Date Listed: 2026-04-29
10. Rating on Isabella Calafate in the Spanish department
Teaching Ability Availability Helpfulness Workload* Opinion: 3309 - I adore Dr. Calafate. I heard a lot about linguistics being the hardest Spanish course, but honestly I thought it was pretty straightforward. There is a lot of memorization of unheard of concepts, especially in the first unit, but the exams are very straightforward. She gives you a study guide that looks exactly like the exam about a week in advance, and dedicates a whole class period to review before the exams. I only felt the need to study for a couple hours the night before each exam, as long as I paid attention in class and took good notes. Do the practice examples, and you'll do fine! I absolutely recommend Calafate for this course. - Grade In Class:A Date Listed: 2026-04-29
MORE RATINGS (11 - 20)
LOGIN     HOME     ABOUT US     FAQ     PRIVACY     TERMS OF USE     ADVERTISING     CONTACT US

©2003-2026 Bubooks.com - All rights reserved